|
2007 Texas Legislative
Changes
There were several significant changes passed
by the Legislature that affect family law that have either already been signed or are on the
Governor’s desk. The legislation's highlights are:
increase in guideline
child support
Provides specifically for lump-summing a child support obigation upon an
obligor's death and also ordering the obligor to carry life insurance.
significantly eased the
parenting plan requirements in all cases involving children
deals with some
characterization and reimbursement issues
specifically provides for
electronic communication between a parent and child, including those on
military deployment
provides guidance for
assisted reproduction / artificial insemination
clarifies the rights of Associate Judges in
family law cases
gives more enforcement
powers to the Attorney General and clarifies how child support arrearages
are collected
clarifies the rights of non parents who
have been taking care of a child for more than six months and transfers of
cases
More specific details follows:
Signed by Governor Already
SB 430
This act clarifies the burden of proof for
certain claims for reimbursement.
It provides that "[t]he
party seeking an offset to a claim for reimbursement has the burden
of proof with respect to the offset."
This Act was signed by the Governor on May
10, 2007 and goes into effect on September 1, 2007.
SB 430 can be viewed at
80(R) SB 430 - Enrolled version - Bill Text
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us:80/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=SB430
SB 432
This act addresses consent to and annulment
of marriages.
The act modifies the language of Texas
Family Code §§ 2.102 and 2.103 by regarding who, other than a parent, can
consent to the marriage of a minor. The act broadens the language from a
"judicially designated managing conservator of the applicant’s person" to
a "person who has the court-ordered right to consent to marriage for the
applicant". The act repeals Texas Family Code § 6.101 and states adds
language clarifying that a marriage is void if either party to the
marriage is younger than 16 years of age, unless a court order has been
obtained under Section 2.103.
The act was signed by the Governor on May
10, 2007 and goes into effect on September 1, 2007.
SB 432 can be viewed at
80(R) SB 430 - Enrolled version - Bill Text
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us:80/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=SB432
Passed and Sent to Governor
SB 228
This act relates to suits affecting the
parent-child relationship, including proceedings for the establishment,
modification, and enforcement of child support, parentage, and possession
of and access to a child. The act also provides a civil penalty.
The act amended the
Texas Family Code to include provisions regarding electronic communication
with the child by a conservator, adding the child enlisting in the
military as a event upon which child support terminates, and setting forth
standards regarding compliance concerning partial termination of support
obligations. (new Section 153.015) The act also adds provision to the Texas Family Code that
states that the court retains jurisdiction to render an order for
retroactive child support in a suit if the petition requesting retroactive
child support is filed not later than the fourth anniversary of the
child’s eighteenth birthday.
The act also amends the
Texas Family Code to increase the time period during which the court
retains jurisdiction to render a contempt order for failure to comply with
a child support order from not later than six months after the child
becomes and adult or child support otherwise terminates to the second
anniversary of the date the child becomes and adult or on which the child
support obligation terminates under the order or by operation of law, to
include an arrest warrant ordered under the chapter, instead of just a
capias, and to include Title IV-D service fees that the obligor is
responsible for on the priority list of how child support is applied.
The act makes Title IV-D service fees part
of the child support obligation, and the fees may be enforced against the
obligor by any means available for enforcement of child support, including
contempt. The length of time before a person taken into custody on capias
and not released on bond must be brought before the court that issued
capias has also been increased, as has the length of time before a hearing
on the alleged contempt must be held. The act also provides the Title IV-D
agency with new remedies, such as withholding from severence pay and
withholding from lump sum payments, such as bonuses, commissions, or
amounts paid in lieu of vacation.
The act also makes
amendments to the Texas Family Code with regards to assisted reproduction.
The amendments define "donor" with regard to assisted reproduction and
includes section that establish an unmarried man’s paternity of the child
of assisted reproduction, require the signed consent forms for certain
assisted reproduction actions must be kept by a licensed physician, and
that deal with the effects of dissolution of marriage or death of a spouse
prior to the placement of sperm, eggs, or embryos.
This act was sent to the Governor on May 28,
2007.
SB 228 can be viewed at:80(R)
SB 228 - Enrolled version - Bill Text
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=SB228
HB 448
This act relates to the computation of
child support obligations.
The act
raises the cap on net resources subject to the child support formula
from $6,000 of monthly net resources to $7,500 of monthly net
resources. This means that the maximum guideline child support for 2
children rises from $1500 to $1875 per month. The act also provides
that this dollar amount is to be adjusted for inflation every six years.
The Title IV-D agency shall compute the adjusted amount based on the
percentage change during the preceding six-year period in the consumer
price index, as rounded to the nearest $50 increment, and publish the
adjusted amount in the Texas Register before September 1 of the year in
which the adjustment takes effect.
The act also includes language with
regard to taking expenses for health insurance coverage for the
obligor's child into account in determining child support. If the obligor
has more than one child covered under the same health insurance coverage,
the court is directed to divide the total cost to the obligor for the
insurance by the total number of minor dependents, including the child,
covered under the plan.
This act was sent to the Governor on May 28, 2007.
HB 448 can be viewed at
80(R) HB 448 - Enrolled version - Bill Text
HB 555
This act makes
revisions to the "parenting plan" provisions of the Texas Family
Code.
The act amends Texas Family Code §
153.007(d) to limit the power of the court in situations were the court
does not find that the agreed parenting plan is in the best interest of
the child. The amendment provides that if the court finds the agreed
parenting plan is not in the child's best interest, the court may request
the parties to submit a revised parenting plan. If the parties do not
submit a revised parenting plan satisfactory to the court, the court may,
after notice and hearing, order a parenting plan that the court finds to
be in the best interest of the child. Prior to this amendment, if the
court found that the agreed parenting plan was not in the best interest of
the child the court could either request that the parties submit a revised
parenting plan or the court could render an order for conservatorship and
possession of the child.
The act amends Texas Family Code §
153.0071, adding that the provisions for confidentiality of alternative
dispute resolution procedures apply to the work of a parenting coordinator
and to the parties or any other person who participates in parenting
coordination. The subsection does not however, affect the duty of a person
to report abuse or neglect under Texas Family Code § 261.101. The act also
amends Texas Family Code § 153.133(b) to make alternative dispute
resolution procedures permissive in agreed parenting plans, rather than
mandatory.
The act amends the definitions of
"dispute resolution process", "high-conflict case", "parenting
coordinator", and "parenting plan" in the definitions set forth in Texas
Family Code § 153.601. The definition of "dispute resolution process" is
broadened to include "any other method of voluntary dispute resolution."
The definition of "high-conflict case" is narrowed by requiring that the
court finds that the parties have met the factors required for a
"high-conflict case". The act removes the requirement for a temporary
parenting plan, as set forth in Texas Family Code § 153.602, and states
instead that in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship temporary
orders are not required to include a temporary parenting plan. The
amendment also precludes local rules or practice from requiring the
submission of a temporary parenting plan. Texas Family Code § 153.603 is
amended to provide that a parenting plan must be included in any final
order in a suit to affecting a parent-child relationship except as
provided in § 153.603(b).
The act also amends the language of
Texas Family Code § 153.606, changing the "authority of the parenting
coordinator" to "duties of the parenting coordinator". Texas Family Code §
153.607(b) is amended to require, rather than permit, the court to remove
a parenting coordinator on the request and agreement of both parties or on
the motion of one party if good cause is shown.
This act was sent to the Governor on May 28,
2007.
HB 555 can be viewed at:80(R)
HB 555 - Enrolled version - Bill Text
HB 930
This act relates to certain orders
rendered by, and preservation of the record in matters heard by, an
associate judge under the Family Code.
With regard to the powers of the
associate judge, this act grants the associate judge the power to render
and sign a final order in a case in which a party files an unrevoked
waiver made in accordance with Rule 119, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure,
that waives notice to the party of the final hearing or waives the party's
appearance at the final hearing, and to sign a final order that includes a
waiver of the right of appeal pursuant to Section 201.015. The act also
provides that an answer filed by a party who previously waived notice to
the party of the final hearing or waived the party's appearance at the
final hearing revokes that waiver.
With regard to preservation of records
in matters heard by an associate judge, the act adds language to §
201.009(a) that a court reporter is required to be provided when the
associate judge presides over a contested final termination
hearing. The addition of the word "contested" seems to mean that it is no
longer required to provide a court reporter in uncontested final
termination hearings. The act also adds language to § 201.009(c) which
states that except as provided in § 201.009(a), in absence of a court
reporter or on agreement of the parties, the record may be preserved by
any means approved by the associate judge. The seems to mean that except
in situations where a court reporter is required by § 201.009(a) (where
the associate judge presides over a jury trial or a contested final
termination hearing) the parties can agree to preserve the record by any
other means approved by the associate judge.
This act was sent to the Governor on May 28,
2007.
HB 930 can be viewed at
80(R) HB 930 - Enrolled version - Bill Text
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us:80/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=HB930
HB 1995
Appeal of Associate Judge's
Ruling
Amending Section
201.015, the bill provides that a party now has until not later than the
"seventh working day" after the date a party receives notice of the Associate
Judge's ruling to appeal--applicable to suits involving the parent child
relationship filed after September 1, 2007. Comment: This
one confuses the powers of an AJ. The former statute dealt with ALL cases that
an AJ can hear; this change applies specifically to parent-child cases.
So now what is the appeal time limit--if any-- for non parent-child cases
(divorces without children) heard by the AJ? Or is there even an appeal in such cases? It
would appear that the clear legislative intent was merely to change the three
day appeal period to a seven day period in all AJ cases. Which Court of
Appeals will step up first to insert what was omitted in the statute?
HB1995 can be
viewed
here.
SB617
Allows the Court to determine the
amount of unpaid child support (including medical coverage) that would have
accrued after the obligor's death, and lump sum it as a charge again the
obligor's estate. Also allows the Court to require an obligor to get
life insurance to cover the future expected child support obligation--with
benefits payable to the obligee. Section 154.015, 154.016.
SB617 can be viewed
here.
We will update after the deadline for the
Governor to sign or veto--June 17th--passes. We will also update when
more arcane provisions in other bills are discovered.
10/15/2007

|