|
2005 Legislative Changes
Highlights:
Custody cases are now "Parenting Plan" cases like the rest of the
country and may have a "Parenting Coordinator"
Grandparents rights to access to their grandchildren tightened
Defines marriage as between [surprise] one man and one woman
Defines percentages of pensions and stock options as separate or
community
Clarifies income in a partition agreement
Allows the agreement from a traditional settlement conference to be
as enforceable as a Mediated Settlement Agreement
Alimony tuned; can be indefinite when there is a disabled child
Court can [finally] consider tax consequences of the assets in a
divorce
Texas [again] has a statute of limitations for past due child support
Military Deployment
Details (Section references are to Texas Family Code):
Parenting Plans
In its 2005 wisdom, "The Legislature finds that the use of parenting plans
and parenting coordinators in suits affecting the parent-child relationship
will assist in promoting the interest of children and in helping litigants
resolve their issues relating to parenting." Section 153.601 et seq. are
intended to assist parties in minimizing conflicts in their post-divorce
parenting through (1) creating a "parenting plan" which establishes the
parents’ rights and duties with respect to the children and which provides
procedures for resolution of future disputes and (2) by court-appointment of
"an impartial third party" to assist the parents in developing and
implementing their "parenting plan". The court may appoint this "parenting
coordinator" over a parent’s objection in a "high conflict case." The
parenting coordinator is paid by the parties, like a mediator, except for
hardship exceptions. She has no power to impose a solution and may not testify
in Court.
Grandparents
Section 153.433 has raised the burden of proof a grandparent must meet to
gain possession of an access to her grandchildren over the parent’s objection.
The grandparent now must defeat the presumption that a parent acts in the best
interest of the parent’s child by proving by a preponderance of the evidence
that denial of possession of or access to the child would significantly impair
the child’s physical health or emotional well-being before a Court will grant
permission or access.
Marriage
Texas will defines the marriage relationship to be between one man and one
women (subject to approval of the voters in a constitutional amendment
election on November 8, 2005). Several other changes were made to clarify the
information required to get married and penalties for somebody conducting a
marriage without authority. Now incarcerated persons and military personnel
can be married from afar §2.006.
Employment Property Interests, Disability, and Insurance Proceeds
Defined/ Clarified
Section 3.007 gives definitions in the common situation where an employee
was employed at the time of the marriage, and therefore has a separate
property interest in the eventual pension, or is divorced prior to vesting or
payment of the pension, as defined 3.007(a), (b), (c).
3.007(d) deals with stock options and restricted stock plans that easily
define the rights of stock interest that are granted prior to the marriage but
mature during the marriage, or granted during the marriage and mature after
the marriage.
Both are simply a calculation comparing the total time between grant date
and vesting and the ratio of marital and non marital portions of that time.
Insurance proceeds insuring the loss of property are now specified to be
defined as the same character as the property insured. This change eliminates
the tension between the idea that a separate property was insured, but paid
with community funds and therefore if upon a casualty loss that the community
would own the proceeds and not the damaged estate.
Significantly, Section 3.008 clarifies that disability insurance payments
that are for loss of earnings is marital property when married and separate
property if for earnings when not married.
Partition and Exchange Agreements
Section 4.102 now requires an affirmative statement that future earnings or
income from property transferred in a partition or exchange agreement shall be
the separate property of the owning spouse rather than there being a
presumption to that effect from the transfer itself. Section 4.104 makes clear
that either type of agreement is enforceable without consideration.
Informal Settlement Conferences Can Lead to BINDING Agreements
Section 6.604 allows the parties to enter into a written settlement
agreement at their own informal settlement conference, with or without
attorneys, that will be binding on the parties if it includes the
non-revocable notice used in mediated settlement agreements and is
appropriately signed. The terms of the signed agreement are binding on the
divorce court only if the court finds that the settlement terms are "just and
right."
Alimony for Custodian of Disabled Child
Section 8.051 allows the divorce court to award post-divorce maintenance to
a spouse exiting a l0+ year marriage who is the custodian of an adult (or
other) child of the marriage whose disabilities make employment outside the
home impractical for the parent. The Section 8.053 presumption against
maintenance now does not apply to a parent whose ability to be employed is
limited by such responsibilities.
Tax Considerations
In dividing the community estate at divorce, the court is now expressly
authorized to consider whether an asset will be subject to taxation and, if
so, when the tax will need to be paid. Section 7.008.
Ten-Year Limit on Child Support Enforcement
Section 157.005 provides that a court retains jurisdiction to confirm
arrearages and render judgment for past-due child support up through 10 years
after the date on which the child becomes an adult or the court-ordered child
support obligation terminates. Previously there was no statute of limitations.
Possession of Child During Military Deployment
Section 156.105 provides that a conservator who is deployed by the military
outside the country may nominate another person to have possession of the
child during that deployment, and the Court may grant that request if it is in
the best interest of the child.
www.raggiolaw.com/2005.htm
08/29/2005
|